Joint and Solidary Obligations

You are here:
< All Topics
Table of Contents

What constitutes a joint and solidary obligation – A joint and solidary obligation is one wherein either one of the several creditors has the right to demand full and complete compliance of an obligation against either one of the debtors.[1] This type of obligation arises only if: (a) the obligation expressly so states; or (b) the law or the nature of the obligation requires solidarity.[2]

Heirs of Servando Franco v. Sps. Gonzales
G.R. No. 159709, 27 June 2012

Servando Franco, Leticia Medel, and the latter’s husband Dr. Rafael Medel obtained four separate loans totaling Php500,000.00 from Veronica R. Gonzales. The debtors bound themselves to be jointly and severally liable for the debts. When the debtors defaulted, the complainant initiated a complaint for the recovery of a sum of money. By way of defense, Servando denied liability claiming that he signed the loan documents only as a witness and that he never benefited from the said loan as the amounts were received only by the Sps. Medel.

HELD: Servando’s liability was joint and solidary with his co-debtors. “In a solidary obligation, the creditor may proceed against any one of the solidary debtors or some or all of them simultaneously The choice to determine against whom the collection is enforced belongs to the creditor until the obligation is fully satisfied Thus, the obligation was being enforced against Servando, who, in order to escape liability, should have presented evidence to prove that his obligation had already been cancelled by the new obligation or that another debtor had assumed his place. In case of change in the person of the debtor, the substitution must be clear and express, and made with the consent of the creditor. Yet, these circumstances did not obtain herein, proving precisely that Servando remained a solidary debtor against whom the entire or part of the obligation might be enforced.”

Best Legal Practices

  • Carefully scrutinize contract for joint and solidary obligation – Considering that a creditor can immediately proceed against a solidary debtor for the full amount of the obligation, contracts should be carefully scrutinized for joint and solidary obligations.
  • Phrases used to effect joint and solidary obligations – Joint and solidary obligations may be effected by the use of “several”, “solidary”, “joint and solidary”, or “I” in cases where there are more than one debtor.
  • No separate contract needed, terms sufficient – Ordinarily, there is a separate contract executed to establish joint and solidary obligation (e.g. Continuing Surety). It should be noted that a separate contract is not required as terms showing joint and solidary obligation may be incorporated in a contract through a clause.
  • Surety not similar to guarantor – A surety is jointly and solidarily liable with the principal debtor and thus the creditor may exact full payment directly against the surety without proceeding against the said debtor. On the other hand, a guarantor is only subsidiarily liable and thus the creditor may only collect from the guarantor after exhausting all the properties of the principal debtor.
  • Take into account joint and solidary obligations imposed by law – There are situations when the law imposes joint and solidary obligations. For instance, the principal is solidarily liable with the contractor for the wages of the latter’s employees. Similar laws creating joint and solidary oblgations should be taken into consideration when entering into a contract.

What constitutes a joint obligation – A joint obligation is one wherein the credit or debt is “divided into as many shares as there are creditors or debtors, the credits or debts being considered distinct from one another.”[3] If from the law or the nature or the wording of the obligation does not show a joint and solidary obligation, then it will be presumed to be a joint obligation.[4]

When credit or debit is impossible – In the event that a division of the credit or debt is impossible, the right of the creditors may be prejudiced only by their collective acts.[5] Thus, the debt can be enforced only by proceeding against all of the debtors.”[6] If one of the debtors is insolvent, the others are not be liable for his share.[7]

Rules on joint and solidary obligation – The following are the rules on joint and solidary obligations:

  • If an obligation is indivisible, it does not necessarily follow that the obligation is joint and solidary, nor does solidarity of itself imply indivisibility.[8] Nonetheless, there may be solidarity even if the creditors and the debtors are not bound in the same manner and by the same periods and conditions.[9]
  • Either one of the solidary creditors may act and do whatever may be useful to the others.[10] However, neither may act in such a way as to be prejudicial to the rest.[11] Hence, a solidary creditor cannot assign his rights without the consent of the others.[12]
  • Either one of the debtor may pay any one of the solidary creditors.[13] However, the debtor is required to pay to the creditor who has made a demand if one has been made.[14]
  • If any of the solidary creditor and any of the solidary debtor enters into novation, compensation, confusion or remission of debt, the obligation is extinguished without prejudice to the consequences of remission.[15] The creditor responsible for the latter, as well as the one who has collected the debt, is liable to the other for the corresponding share of his co-creditors.[16]
  • The creditor has the right to proceed against any one of the solidary debtors or some or all of them simultaneously.[17] If the solidary debtor who has been sued was unable to fully pay the debt, the creditor may proceed against the others until the debt has been fully and completely paid.[18]
  • Should one of the solidary debtors pay in full the debt, the obligation is extinguished[19] so long as the obligation has not yet prescribed or become illegal.[20] If there are more than one solidary debtors who offer to pay, the creditor has the right to choose which offer to accept.[21] The solidary debtor who paid has the right to reimbursement against his co-debtors only the share which corresponds to each, with the interest for the payment already made.”[22] No interest may be demanded if payment was made before the debt is due.[23] However, if one of the solidary debtors is insolvent, his share is proportionally borne by all the other co-debtors.[24]

When creditor releases one of the solidary debtors – While the creditor may release a solidary debtor with respect to the latter’s share in the obligation, the latter is not released from his obligation to the other co-debtors should the debt have been totally paid by anyone of them prior to the remission made by the creditor.[25] If one of the solidary debtor successfully obtained a remission of the whole obligation from the creditor, the said debtor is not entitled to any reimbursement from his co-debtor.[26]

When the thing has been lost or when the prestation has become impossible – The joint and solidary obligation is extinguished if the thing has been lost or if the prestation has become impossible without the fault of the solidary debtors.[27] However, if just any one of them was at fault, all are responsible to the creditor, for the price and the payment of damages and interest, without prejudice to their action against the guilty or negligent debtor.[28] These rules apply as well if one of the debtors incurred delay after a judicial or extrajudicial demand by the creditor and the thing is lost or the performance has become impossible due to a fortuitous event.[29]

Solidary debtor entitled to defenses – If the creditor has filed an action, a solidary debtor has the right to avail himself of all defenses that are derived from the nature of the obligation and of those which are personal to him, or pertain to his own share.[30] For defenses that personally belong to the other co-debtors, the solidary debtor may avail himself thereof “only as regards that part of the debt for which the latter are responsible.”[31]


[1] CIVIL CODE. Article 1207. Joint and solidary obligations are ometimes referred to as “joint and several” or “solidary” obligation.

[2] Ibid. Consequently, the concurrence of more than one creditor or debtor, as the case may be, in one and the same obligation will not necessarily imply that either one of the former has a right to demand, or that each of the latter is bound to render, entire compliance with the prestation (Article 1207, Civil Code).

[3] CIVIL CODE. Article 1208.

[4] Ibid.

[5] CIVIL CODE. Article 1209.

[6] Ibid. Article 1209.

[7] Ibid.

[8] CIVIL CODE. Article 1210.

[9] Ibid. Article 1211.

[10] Ibid. Article 1212.

[11] Ibid.

[12] CIVIL CODE. Article 1213.

[13] Ibid. Article 1214.

[14] Ibid.

[15] CIVIL CODE. Article 1215.

[16] Ibid. Paragraph 2, Article 1215.

[17] Ibid. Article 1216.

[18] Ibid.

[19] CIVIL CODE. Paragraph 1, Article 1217.

[20] Ibid. Article 1218.

[21] Ibid. Paragraph 1, Article 1217.

[22] Ibid. Paragraph 2, Article 1217.

[23] Ibid.

[24] CIVIL CODE. Paragraph 3, Article 1217.

[25] Ibid. Article 1219.

[26] Ibid. Article 1220.

[27] Ibid. Paragraph 1, Article 1221.

[28] Ibid. Paragraph 2, Article 1221.

[29] Ibid. Paragraph 3, Article 1221.

[30] Ibid. Article 1222.

[31] Ibid.

©2020 BUSINESSLAW.PH. All rights reserved. Statements and opinions of the author are of his own, and does not reflect any organization he may be connected or affiliated. All information herein are for educational and general information only. The content should not be considered as a legal advice or opinion. Please consult a lawyer to address your specific concerns.
Copy link
Powered by Social Snap